Name and logo are withheld under NDA. This was a client engagement, not a concept project.
Starting problem
What was taking too long.
Releases were manual. Environments differed, so deploys were slow to finish and easy to break. The team had little warning when something failed.
Our work
What the team delivered.
We packaged the application with Docker, added a CI/CD pipeline, cloud hosting, monitoring, and a rollback plan. The team was one project lead and two cloud engineers.
Outcome
What the client reported.
The client reported that releases were safer and that failed deploys were easier to spot. That feedback came from the review after the 6–8 week engagement. We are not publishing an uptime percentage.
Visual evidence
A labelled demonstration.
The client has not approved a screenshot of their live system. The picture below is a demonstration of the kind of screen we built. It is not their interface and it does not show their data.
Demonstration — not a client screenshot
Cloud DevOps Transformation
Manufacturing · 6-8 weeks
CI/CD pipeline
Docker packaging
Cloud hosting
Monitoring dashboards
Delivery
Features and how the pieces fit.
Features
CI/CD pipeline
Docker packaging
Cloud hosting
Monitoring dashboards
Rollback plan
Architecture
Docker
GitLab CI/CD
AWS
Monitoring
Nginx
Before
Manual deployments
Inconsistent environments
Limited monitoring
Slow recovery
We can ship updates with much more confidence, and we know immediately when something needs attention.
A manufacturing technology team Quote from the project record. The speaker’s name is not published under the NDA.
A similar problem?
Tell us what is slow in your team today.
We will say whether a first version like this fits, and what we would need from you.
